No
comment |
We have never intentionally weakened our products |
You have excessive expectations of robustness |
La, la, la
we're not
listening |
You've got a conflict of interest |
We're fully
ISO-9001
compliant |
You don't understand
the context |
What kind of a person looks for flaws? |
That's just
theoretical
mumbo-jumbo |
No one
would ever
think of
that |
That's only
there for
backward
compatibility |
You're
just an
academic |
security
problem
excuse
BINGO |
Under no circumstances do we design or enable any back doors |
We follow industry standard practices |
| We always act in the best interests of customers |
Nothing is
100% secure |
We meet all industry standards |
It would be
too expensive
to fix that |
Who are you
to criticize,
anyway? |
You're part
of a
conspiracy |
Your privacy
is our priority |
Let's see
you
design
something
better |
If you hadn't
told anyone,
it would still
be secure |
We read
Schneier's
book |